2 Comments so far

1. Jeff Wright on March 30, 2008 8:50 pm

   Thanks for the link! Its been a good discussion and two other posts have spun off from the original.

2. Rick on March 31, 2008 12:48 pm

   Interesting post, but as many of the comments at that site mention, the writer(s) somewhat overstated the case and consquences. They bring up good points that raise questions, but their definitions of terms and sequence (arminianism=”dualism”=”boasting”=”shutting God out”=etc…) will not be the same as those on the other side.
   This somewhat touches on the orthodoxy discussion at Parch. & Pen. As Mark Mathews commented at the Conserv Refor. Mafia post:
   “I certainly don’t agree with Arminian theology and think it has its problems, but Calvinism, as such, has its problems as well. Any systematic approach to theology, while necessary and helpful, has its holes. To say that Arminians, who may or may not have an understanding of omnicausality, and may not believe it are denying God is way off base.
   Are you saying that a person who believes in the person and work of Christ, His substitutionary death and atonement for sin, His resurrection and ascension but might not believe in omnicausality is denying God? It certainly might be denying certain attributes of God but by no means does it go that far.”